Meeting 28.10.2024

Attendees

  • Markus
  • Andrei (protocol done)
  • Filip
  • Jannis
  • Johannes
  • Lukas
  • Stefanie

Cannot come (Sick):

  • Christoph

Buddies

  • Stefanie & Christoph & Andrei
  • Jannis & Lukas
  • Filip & Johannes

Agenda

  • 09:00 start
  • protocol: Lukas
  • Jannis presentation of debugging
  • mark old Nextcloud accounts with TOREMOVE in name
  • remove your old branches
  • biology
  • dev needed in afternoon (don't rebuild dev)
  • dev build broken -> fixed
  • release next week, this week:
    • Diesel update
    • landing page fixes
  • more reviews:
    • testing
    • code
    • guidelines update
  • Filip and Johannes disconnect
  • restructure of manual test cases
  • reduce issues by alternative fixes, e.g. Löschpinsel
  • use case updates
  • brushing layer architecture (enum?)
  • result of areas over areas (Jannis)
  • guidelines: units for forms -> to be decided by Markus
  • Task Board
  • 11:00 finish

Tasks

To be done until Thursday 31.10.2024:

  • remove your old branches (or write in issue)
  • mark duplicates of Nextcloud accounts (or write in issue)
  • complete your issues or state in the issue any block/alternative
  • approve requested MRs, including meeting MR
  • create/update issues for yourself and assign to next iteration

Do as needed:

  • request reviews
  • submit a page of text in submissions
  • get MRs done

Meeting Notes

Jannis presented his Python-script for debugging broadcasting (remote) actions. The script can be found in the benchmark folder of the PermaplanT repository. When the script is running and the frontend is used the script observes and visualizes all remote actions being sent by the frontend.

Comment in the issue for removing old branches if investigation for one's old branches is done and those were removed.

Also write to Nextcloud issue, if you have duplicate accounts.

If a code review is not possible by reviewing the code itself, testing the user functionality of the MR is sufficient.

The need for different new E2E tests was discussed.

The expertise of a person with biological knowledge input was discussed. This person should be able to write manual test cases and be consistent with the database. This person should also be able to give inputs for improving the search for the focus on biodiversity.

A solution for overlapping areas needs to be figured out. Lukas and Jannis should think about possible solutions for this to discuss this in the future.